Wednesday 29 August 2012

A lost republic; where did we come from?

0 comments

A lost republic; where did we come from?

As the world turned the lens with keen attention to where I grew up to know as country, I was tempted with a desire to grapple with an imagination of the future of a wanton state of nationhood. To be candid and as for me, this may have been a written soliloquy of despair and desperation perhaps as I really can’t help wonder about where it all might probably end. The leaders from the south had said that if the eventual decision from the referendum is to split Sudan into two, the emergence of a new nation will not be an end in itself but the beginning for something new. That, myself and I guess so many others world over would have supposed too.  Observers had not only gone from world over to Sudan to see for themselves, they had been commenting since it was decided that the future of the country will be determined by the referendum. More importantly, they wanted to know what would happen to the existing structure of the country with reference to the dimensions of the proposed border lines, the existing rich oil reserve located at that same border, the existing wealth and debt of the country among many others. I really did not blame anyone for desiring to know all that, on a backdrop of our knowledge of what happened in that country when it was yet a single entity, more so,  comparing that with speculations of what could happen after, i.e. now that everyone had made up their minds; they had to go their separate ways. I had believed there would be a sought of more, though camouflage, responsibility to the nation and the people when it was yet one entity than when it is divided into a northern and southern nation. I thought so because a war quest to defend your nation’s sovereignty is easy to sell much more than a civil war in the market place of international politics and power play. 

My anxiety then was probably focused on what the means of resolution might be, in a case that there arose further disputes as to who got what and as to who gave what after the referendum was far over. How will both nations perceive themselves? What behaviors will be formed from those perceptions? Will it not be an African version of Seoul and the DPRK? All these however, were best being thought of when I first contemplated on the issue of having two Sudan. I am still thinking though. These and more were as much as my thoughts and paranoia for a Sudan that was very much an important part of the Africa I came from.

However, as important as it was, the referendum and events that followed after and is yet occurring there did not come close to my heart as much as it could have been if it were to be a case dealing in issues about the Nigerian state of nationhood. However, I did fathom a point of congruence with regards to current occurrence in both countries. That was a hope that as the Sudan has divided, she will be the last great national entity that would voyage into a search for a new beginning on the continent. In my opinion, national breakups are not as demanding as the need for nations to grow up on the African continent. On many occasions though, breaking up and growing up had both been inevitably bloody.

The most populous Black Country in the world is Nigeria. When compared to many other African countries, Nigeria is of greater concern in many spheres. Sometimes I feel Nigeria’s popularity is also quite enviable. But, I am compelled to note that though the world was not watching Nigeria as much as it watched Sudan, Egypt and Tunisia at those moment in question, the events that simultaneously occurred in Nigeria was also worth looking into then. As the Sudan waited for the results of their votes on whether to either stick together for life or to split up and as the northern nations of Egypt and Tunisia were experiencing political unrest due to their people’s call for an end to oligarchy, Nigeria was getting ready to decide a new leadership. The Nigerian media had already been flooded with many campaign jingles and divers, some sort political propaganda from all kinds of would be elected Politicians from the Good luck – Sambo duo, to Atiku, Babangida (that was before the emergence of the northern consensus candidate for the PDP and prior to the party’s primaries’) and the Ribadu presidential aspirants, as well as other gubernatorial, senatorial and house of representative hopefuls. Not left behind were the local government chairmanship aspirants too.

What had primarily held while I first wrote this piece were the numerous party primaries and the voters’ registration. Some of the parties had essentially decided on who will be bearing their flag for the gubernatorial and senatorial cadres. Some others were still slugging it out. The big one is who would be the presidential candidates for all the vying parties and of more importance is that of the ruling People’s Democratic Party. It was known then that General Buhari was contesting on the CPC platform while the former Vice President; Atiku Abubakar and the incumbent president had worked tirelessly to clinch the PDP’s ticket.

The caliber of men that desired to rule in Nigeria was one that is most amazing, perhaps, the most amusing phenomenon of the country’s politics. This has been so since the days of dictatorial and deadly military regimes to the partially democratic and somewhat oligarchic regime of an assumed democratically elected president (who then, had recently visited the Ivory Coast to mediate, not realizing that there was little difference in Mr. Gbagbo’s actions and the third term agenda). What made it all so stunning then was the fact that it was yet rare to find a contemporary new breed politician holding sway as the Obama’s of the west did.

I thought any curious person would want to know why these men were all we’ve got or perhaps, as it seemed, why they were the ones that had been able to plant themselves like canker worms within the Nigerian polity. And annoyingly, the more we secretly wished them away the stronger they became and unfortunately the more “dead weight” we became. All these continued to defy possible change, despite Mr. Chukwumerije’s comment, after winning his party’s ticket, which I implied to mean the cost of running for political office in Nigeria only skyrocketed with time and possibly the only thing that might be capable of going higher than the country’s inflationary index.

Truly and painfully, the old blocks have refused to cave in. They are still the ones we continued to see so glaringly. And, anyone may want to ask if it isn’t probably because they are the ones that not only decide the cost of politics in the country but also because they are the only ones who can pay for it financially and otherwise? This vicious circle keeps going round and round. From the governors who had won second terms, to another governor who, from second term in office sought to become a senator, as well as other house of representative and senate members who came again for fresh terms, and not forgetting the sibling and ward of former and present politicians who wanted to become governor after a relative who just signed out. There was also one that sought to continue a dynasty built on the father’s life and still another who had been around for quite some time who profoundly worked to exemplify the character of her father’s ruler-ship legacy and ideology of presiding over a generation.

Alas I bemoaned, if I must not be afraid for Nigeria maybe I can despair a little, or at least take solace in wondering. This is because the political continuum has generated much concern than it should have, if there were actually apathy on the part of other citizens; the ordinary and the not so ordinary. What we have is not a consequence of apathy. I believe Nigerians are not apathetic towards politics. I believe politics here is merely worse than the devil’s nightmare. If you don’t have the guts to get in its trenches, you will be doing well by truly staring clear.  Who can’t bear witness to the gruesome abuse of many bright, well-meaning and sometimes neo-Nigerian politicians? Who can’t bear witness to the cruel termination by assassination of others alike? I wonder if we have soon forgotten about the killing of chief Bola Ige, Mr. Funso William and many others like them. Most of which happened at the zenith of their political endeavors. Who then will not be afraid for a dear life and the future of a dear spouse and children? I know it is not legally right to say that the cold blood murdering of well-meaning individuals from that of chief Bola Ige to the least of it all were political killings but what more can anyone assume especially when these men in black (now with a touch of blue and a ash coloured camouflage) called Nigerian Police yet have never been able to find a single suspect to the termination of any one of these great individuals. Instead, they have not shown to be ashamed of corrupting their priceless badge, uniform and a pledge to protecting life and property, so shamelessly, as much as they are forcefully, in collecting twenty naira bribes, in the public view, from ordinary Nigerians trying to make ends meet by transporting other fellow Nigerians. It’s jokingly said that they report to a crime scenes, to round up and arrest sightseers, when the least of the real criminals is long gone and probably snoring away on his bed.

Bye and large, as it is now, it is either the old blocks or the chips of the old blocks. Per se, it is not only unsafe to rub shoulders with them. It is expensive as well, with chances that allows for ghastly and costly consequences for anyone who dares well enough. The means remain with the people that have the means. Those means they have acquired by less hook and much more crook means since the Nigerian Nation came into existence, having all it takes in its very crude form too.

Now, the question is: will this continue to be the way the Nigerian nation will continue to evolve? If the answer is yes, it simply means, among many other things, that the cost price of politics will continue to climb to higher grounds, with a continual creation of financial and moral barriers for other new aspiring political markets prospective entrants or person with a good will but with little or not enough means. This high cost price will only continue to be within the reach of these few crooked elites and their dynasty members. Well observed though, but then, that will not be where it will all end. The financing of these cruel and gruesome ventures of the democratic “powers” of Nigeria must always come from somewhere. And, more than often, from the black market of financial corruption; the market where it had always come from. If you think I have erred in this aspect you may try to present an argument for the most wealthy of Nigerians, as to their source of wealth in difference to a time or term of active politics (military or democratic) or of affiliations to active politicians. Sometimes ago, grapevine had it that one of the quite popular governors from the western part of the country donated a whooping sum of hundreds of million Naira towards the funding of the incumbent president presidential campaign. That same governor is acclaimed on the streets to have mortgaged almost all his state’s assets and future viability. The arm of government responsible for providing water in that state does not live up to their call, not until residents agree to buy water again from the agency (through its water tanker supply services) and that is after having paid your monthly water bills. It is said, that if it were possible, the governor will have the people living in the state pay for the air they breathe. Why will such a person contribute that much to another’s political agenda if it is not because it is surely a viable form of investment?

Funny enough though, as well as being the climax of it all is the dynamics added to this drama by the fact that an economic and financial crimes watchdog called the EFCC Is all over the place more or less like a restless dog. The agency’s activity and all what is happening is like a chase after bandits of national treasure hunters. Unfortunately, by the time they all get to the presumably location of the great wealth or treasure they all want to take (the national cake as it is called in Nigeria) and thereafter, by the time they have finished digging to the bottom of it all, it could all be gone. By then we will all (actors and spectators) be in trouble for making so much fuss about what was either actually not there anymore, what was gone before now or what was nonexistent in the first place.

The market place term for what everyone wants in Nigeria is the “national cake”. The political elites and their cohorts are plundering the little (although believed to be much by the leaders and generation that existed back then before and since independence) wealth of the country. They are digging it all up for themselves alone wherever and whenever it can be found on the corridors of power and governance and at the expense of all other things including the simple dignity of humanity. The common man, hence, is left to his own faith. The government doesn’t seem to appear to care as much as to even provide him with the basic human needs like food and water, shelter, security, electricity, education and transport not to talk of employment. This simply means: if he must survive, he too must learn to fend for himself by becoming to himself what the government should have been in a rightly behaving system. Most Nigerians are rather a government to and for themselves in the current situation. Being a government to and for you and you alone is mostly what the average Nigerian does by any hook and every crook means, denying also his immediate and other neighbors the rights to sanity and other basic human needs.

The meaning of this hence, is that in Nigeria; the people are basically and actually of the same kind in terms of nature and reasoning, at the moment, whether in leadership or followership. But there is a more important truth: we are a reflection of all these powers and forces that rule over us politically as a country. Some other people have argued otherwise; that the leadership however is a reflection of the type and nature of the Nigerian people themselves, hinging their arguments on notions such as the ones that says what a person really is can only be manifested when that person becomes someone of reckon. But I differ from this arguments on the grounds that every man is an “either or.”  He has both inclinations to be good and to be bad in any given circumstance. What we are is what we chose and continually choose to be in the situations we find ourselves. The politicians have chosen to be mostly manipulators and plunderers of their own accord and the populace have followed suit in their own simple ways. The government agencies is now chasing after anybody and everybody in phony and unprecedented manner. The ordinary Nigerian now runs and seeks for his own self alone as does his political leader. They all have an important objective of being able to locate their own slice of the national cake or their own share of the national treasure before it’s all gone to another whether on the streets of Nigeria or in government circles from every local government council to Aso rock.

The average Nigerian really wishes to collect what he can for himself and thereafter disappear into a thin air, in no time, before any one from any of the anti-corruption units or other government agencies called in. So what can we hope for in that kind of social system? I think, you can only expect or hope that by the time we all get there, what we came looking for, thinking to be there all this while would not have disappeared into a thin air too.  I also think, you can only expect or hope that we have not followed directions found in a vain map of vanity, holding on so powerfully to and allowing ourselves to be led to the nowhere we would eventually find ourselves. This may unfortunately be that point where we’ll come to learn and understand, though being too late; that what makes a nation is actually what each and every one concern gives to it and not what each and every one concern can take from it. What makes a nation is what government and citizens put into it and not what they took or can take from it.

That place too, on its own will not be an end in itself but it will be the beginning of a new thing, as the leader of the south Sudan had said about the prospect the new South Sudan. Notably, however lofty a new nation had been for the people of south Sudan who have suffered severally over the decades from the western concept of what a people and a nation should be (like Nigeria is also suffering today, though with more propensity towards mediocrity and fear of confronting the lie) and especially in the hands of the northern powers led by a man wanted by the international community for crimes against humanity, the Nigerian version of societal progressions, sovereignty, national emancipation may not lead to or be as much as a “good end – new beginning” story as that of the Sudan. That is because, one way or the other, we have bought and bonded into the ideology of the Nigerian state of nationhood unlike the people of the Sudan, willingly (or unwillingly as it is claimed in some quarters) while hoping there will be nothing wrong in being a mediocre country and people, as long as there is a chance to one day take out of the country what we can get for our individual selves and our individual selves alone.

I believe this to be so because when we get to our own version of a national dead end as it is in Sudan recently, where everyone must have taken out of the nation his own piece of national the cake, the only thing we will be able to say to ourselves will be to ask a question: “where is Nigeria”? Where is my beloved country? Where is the nation I used to think of myself a part of? Now that the plundering is over with nothing to show for it and nothing left to take out of it or to build upon, where is my country going to be? What will it be called and what must I do with myself now? Now that the bandits and the treasure hunters, the national plunderers, the scavengers and the phony agencies have found themselves on the same spot with nothing to take away and not enough evidence to prove that the men we are now meeting and standing with face to face, steering at each other’s face are the thieves that needed to be caught. Where is my country? Where is the nation we have all made bankrupt in the process of living for our own selves alone? Where would be the Nigeria the politicians have thought us how to pilfer and led us to plunder?

Nothing has the power to break up this country as much as financial and political corruption. Not religion or ethnicity but corruption. Let us not wait till when we can only ask; where did we come from? Where is our country? Is it now a lost republic?

Leave a Reply